National Labor Relations Board v. M.D. Miller Trucking and Topsoil, Inc. et al
| National Labor Relations Board |
| M.D. Miller Trucking, Topsoil, Inc. and M.D. Miller Trucking and Topsoil, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv05528 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Sara L Ellis |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SEALED DOCUMENT.(jjr, ) |
| Filing 9 SEALED DOCUMENT. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 7 SEALED ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/2/2018. (jjr, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's ex parte motion to seal ex parte application for writs of execution and garnishment and supporting papers 5 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 10/2/2018. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff National Labor Relations Board by David Paul Boehm. (smm) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (smm) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment by National Labor Relations Board from USCA for the District of Columbia Circuit, Case Number 17-1130; Judgment for National Labor Relations Board and against M.D. Miller Trucking and Topsoil, Inc. entered on 5/23/18. (smm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
