Canvin et al v. Prince Lionheart, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jamie Canvin, Mike Canvin, indivdually and as a natural guardian of J.C., a minor and Mike Canvin
Defendant: Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, Prince Lionheart, Inc., a California corporation, Prince Lionheart, Inc. and Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2018cv06705
Filed: October 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2018 Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #22 . Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he/she will amend the complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss #22 is set for 12/13/2018. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at the next hearing. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 24 Target Corporation's Exhibits in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 8(a)(2), 8(b)(1), 12(B)(6) and 12(f) by Target Corporation (Burke, Robert)
November 29, 2018 Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by Robert Michael Burke for presentment of motion to dismiss, #22 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 12/13/2018 at 09:45 AM. (Burke, Robert)
November 29, 2018 Filing 22 MOTION by Defendant Target Corporation to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2), 8(b)(1), 12(B)(6) and 12(f) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Burke, Robert)
November 29, 2018 Filing 21 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Prince Lionheart, Inc.(Valdetero, Jena)
November 29, 2018 Filing 20 JURY Demand (Valdetero, Jena)
November 29, 2018 Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Prince Lionheart, Inc. (Valdetero, Jena)
November 28, 2018 Filing 18 JURY Demand (Gorman, Catherine)
November 9, 2018 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file answer #15 is granted. Any answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed on or before 11/29/2018. Initial status hearing and joint status report deadline to stand. Motion hearing set for 11/13/2018, is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
November 7, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion by Robert Michael Burke for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #15 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/13/2018 at 09:45 AM. (Burke, Robert)
November 7, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION by Defendant Target Corporation for extension of time to file answer (Burke, Robert)
November 7, 2018 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Timothy R. Couture (Couture, Timothy)
November 7, 2018 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Catherine Powers Gorman (Gorman, Catherine)
November 7, 2018 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Michael Joseph Linneman (Linneman, Michael)
November 7, 2018 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target Corporation by Robert Michael Burke (Burke, Robert)
October 29, 2018 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond #6 is granted. Any answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed on or before 11/29/2018. Initial status hearing previously set for 11/13/2018 is reset for 12/13/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Joint status report shall be filed on or before 12/3/2018. Motion hearing set for 11/6/2018, is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 29, 2018 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Prince Lionheart, Inc. by Bettina J Strauss (Strauss, Bettina)
October 29, 2018 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Prince Lionheart, Inc. by Dan H Ball (Ball, Dan)
October 26, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Jena M. Valdetero for presentment of extension of time, #6 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 11/6/2018 at 09:45 AM. (Valdetero, Jena)
October 26, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Prince Lionheart, Inc. for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, and to Reschedule November 2nd Joint Status Report Due Date and November 13th Status Hearing [UNOPPOSED] (Valdetero, Jena)
October 26, 2018 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Prince Lionheart, Inc. by Jena M. Valdetero (Valdetero, Jena)
October 4, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, )
October 4, 2018 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP%20Standing%20Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 11/13/2018 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 11/2/2018, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
October 4, 2018 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. (jjr, )
October 4, 2018 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Prince Lionheart, Inc., a California corporation, Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation (jjr, )
October 3, 2018 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jamie Canvin, Mike Canvin, indivdually and as a natural guardian of J.C., a minor by Todd M Friedman (Friedman, Todd)
October 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mike Canvin, indivdually and as a natural guardian of J.C., a minor, Jamie Canvin; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15023384. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Friedman, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canvin et al v. Prince Lionheart, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Canvin
Represented By: Todd M Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Canvin, indivdually and as a natural guardian of J.C., a minor
Represented By: Todd M Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Canvin
Represented By: Todd M Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prince Lionheart, Inc., a California corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prince Lionheart, Inc.
Represented By: Bettina J Strauss
Represented By: Jena M. Valdetero
Represented By: Dan H Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Timothy R. Couture
Represented By: Robert Michael Burke
Represented By: Catherine Powers Gorman
Represented By: Michael Joseph Linneman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?