Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Steven Williams |
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The |
1:2019cv00235 |
January 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Charles R Norgle |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven Williams by Marc S. Whitehead (Whitehead, Marc) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15545312. (Whitehead, Marc) |
Filing 8 ORDER: This MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff s Complaint, and the Court being aware that the Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion, it is: ORDERED THAT: Defendant's Motion is hereby Granted and Defendant shall file its Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by no later than March 22, 2019. Signed by the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr on 2/27/2019. Mailed notice. (bg, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for extension of time to answer #5 is granted. The parties are not required to appear before the court on Friday, March 1, 2019. Mailed notice (ewf, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Nathan P. Lusignan for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #5 before Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr. on 3/1/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Lusignan, Nathan) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America, The for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed Motion For An Extension of Time To Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint) (Lusignan, Nathan) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Williams as to Prudential Insurance Company of America, The on 2/8/2019, answer due 3/1/2019. (Routman, Eric) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America, The (rc, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Steven Williams by Eric L. Routman LOCAL COUNSEL (Routman, Eric) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Routman, Eric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steven Williams; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15364276.(Routman, Eric) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven Williams | |
Represented By: | Eric L. Routman |
Represented By: | Marc S. Whitehead |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America, The | |
Represented By: | Nathan P. Lusignan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.