Cases 1 - 10 of 290
Williams v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as 8:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and Jonathan Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00551
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams and Cheryl Williams
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Steven Anderson, Jr.
as 24-1142
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEVEN WILLIAM ANDERSON, JR.
Williams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jose Rodriguez, Neon Chowdhury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Evans v. Bunnell
as 5:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Aaron Evans
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Bunnell and Jailer Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00214
Petitioner:
Steven Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
