Brown v. Miles
Petitioner: Errick Brown
Respondent: Sherwin Miles, Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois and Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2019cv04052
Filed: June 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Robert M Dow
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 Filing 7 FILED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Errick Brown (Exhibits) (Envelope post marked 6/12/2019) (bg, )
July 23, 2019 Filing 6 PAYMENT of Filing fee $5, Receipt #4624227391. (bg, ) (bg, ).
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court denies Petitioner's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis #3 without prejudice to reconsideration should he renew his motion in compliance with this order. Petitioner is given until August 22, 2019 to either to file an in forma pauperis application on the enclosed form with the information required by 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(2) or to pay the $5.00 filing fee. If Petitioner takes no action by that date, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to: (1) send Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application form; (2) terminate Attorney General of the State of Illinois from the docket; and, (3) update the docket to reflect that Respondent Sherwin Miles is the Acting Warden, Stateville Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/22/2019. Mailed notice. (bg, )
July 22, 2019 MAILED copy of order dated 7/22/2019 #5 and a blank in forma pauperis application form to Petitioner Errick Brown. (bg, )
June 17, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER from Errick Brown dated 6/7/2019 for filing fee. (nsf, )
June 17, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Errick Brown for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (nsf, )
June 17, 2019 Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (nsf, )
June 17, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Errick Brown against Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois, Sherwin Miles. (Exhibits) (Attachments: #1 Envelope post marked 6/12/2019)(nsf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Miles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Errick Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sherwin Miles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Office of the Illinois Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?