Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Jackson v. Miles et al
as 1:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Clifton Jackson
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, Donald Terry, John Waugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Khalid Norwood
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv15051
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, John Waugh, Mr. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Carlock et al
as 1:2023cv14804
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Carlock, Isreal Corona, Penny Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scullark v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv03489
Plaintiff:
Sherman Scullark
Defendant:
Sherwin Miles, Matthew Scarbrough, J Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chew v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv02066
Plaintiff:
Devon Chew
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jane and/or John Doe, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingshead v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2023cv04038
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hollingshead
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Kim A Wyhtub, M Zahtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Small v. Sherwin Miles
as 23-1397
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANTE SMALL
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERWIN MILES
Eitenmiller et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eitenmiller, Nina Eitenmiller, Gregory Gurski and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
