Scullark v. Miles et al
| Sherman Scullark |
| Sherwin Miles, Matthew Scarbrough, J Stahl, Schimidt, Craig Carlock and David Martin |
| 1:2023cv03489 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Due to a clerical error, the minute entry entered at #11 is to be removed from the docket. Modified on 7/31/2023 (axc). |
| MAILED copy of Minute Entry #11 to Plaintiff Sherman Scullark. (axc). |
| Filing 10 AMENDED complaint by Sherman Scullark against Craig Carlock, David Martin, Sherwin Miles, Matthew Scarbrough, Schimidt. (rc, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Sherman Scullark of compliance. (Exhibit) (rc, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER RESPONSE by Plaintiff Sherman Scullark. (Exhibits) (rc, )
|
| MAILED Order #7 dated 07/14/2023 to Fiscal Department via email. (rc, ) |
| MAILED blank complaint for persons in custody with instructions, and Order #7 dated 07/14/2023 to Plaintiff Sherman Scullark. (rc, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: By order dated June 16, 2023 #4 , the Court ordered Plaintiff to: (1) pay the full filing fee or submit a properly supported in forma pauperis application; (2) submit an amended complaint on the Court's form; and (3) submit a memorandum listing all of the facilities where he has been in custody during his lifetime and any aliases he has ever used. The Court also warned Plaintiff that if he did not comply with all three directives by July 7, 2023, this case would be summarily dismissed. The Clerk's Office received $403 to apply to the filing fee, as well as a letter from Plaintiff confirming that he paid #6 . The Clerk is directed to refund $1 to Plaintiff as the filing fee is $402. He is also reminded that the June 16, 2023 order required him to do more than simply resolve his fee status. The Court, on its own motion, extends the date to comply with all of the directives in the June 16, 2023 order. Plaintiff must submit: (1) an amended complaint on the Court's form; and (2) a memorandum listing all of the facilities where he has been in custody during his lifetime and any aliases he has ever used. If he fails to comply by August 4, 2023, this case will be summarily dismissed. The Clerk is directed to: (1) send Plaintiff a copy of this order and another form complaint for persons in custody with instructions; and (2) send a copy of this order to the Court's Fiscal Department. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 7/14/2023: Mailed notice. (rc, )
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Sherman Scullark to court order "at Document #4 ". (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: State prisoner Sherman Scullark submitted a complaint [ 1] but did not prepay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis (in other words, pay the filing fee in installments over time). In addition, his complaint is not on the Court's mandatory form, see L.R. 81.1, and does not contain all of the information specified by the form complaint. Plaintiff must: (1) pay the full $402 filing fee or submit a properly supported application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that discloses all income received in the past twelve months from any and all sources (including gifts from family and friends and government stimulus payments); (2) submit an amended complaint on the Court's form; and (3) submit a memorandum listing all of the facilities where he has been in custody during his lifetime and any aliases he has ever used. If Plaintiff fails to comply with all three directives by July 7, 2023, this case will be summarily dismissed. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order, an application for leave to proceed informa pauperis and a form complaint for persons in custody, and instructions. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 6/16/2023: Mailed notice. (rc, )
|
| MAILED a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners form, complaint for persons in custody, instructions, and Order #4 dated 06/16/2023 to Plaintiff Sherman Scullark. (rc, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Entered in Error (axc). Modified on 6/15/2023. |
| Entered in Error Modified on 6/15/2023 (axc). |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Sherman Scullark. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Sherman Scullark. (rc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
