Achimas v. Target
Plaintiff: Juliana Achimas
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv04482
Filed: July 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Eileen Marie Letts for presentment of motion to file instanter #8 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/4/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Letts, Eileen)
August 28, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Target Corporation to file instanter FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AT LAW (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Letts, Eileen)
August 27, 2019 Filing 7 STATUS Report Joint by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Letts, Eileen)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juliana Achimas by Michael Nicholas Folga (Folga, Michael)
July 8, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 9/4/2019 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 8/28/2019. Mailed notice (rj, )
July 3, 2019 Filing 4 E-MAILED notice of removal letter to Brian J McManus, Jr (las, )
July 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, )
July 2, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target by Eileen Marie Letts (Letts, Eileen)
July 2, 2019 Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet, NOTICE of Removal from State Court, case number (2019 L 005651) filed by Target Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15992897. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Filing)(Letts, Eileen)
July 2, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Achimas v. Target
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juliana Achimas
Represented By: Brian J McManus, Jr
Represented By: Michael N Folga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Eileen Marie Letts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?