Achimas v. Target
Juliana Achimas |
Target Corporation |
1:2019cv04482 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Eileen Marie Letts for presentment of motion to file instanter #8 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/4/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Letts, Eileen) |
Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Target Corporation to file instanter FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AT LAW (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Letts, Eileen) |
Filing 7 STATUS Report Joint by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Letts, Eileen) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juliana Achimas by Michael Nicholas Folga (Folga, Michael) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 9/4/2019 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 8/28/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 4 E-MAILED notice of removal letter to Brian J McManus, Jr (las, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Target by Eileen Marie Letts (Letts, Eileen) |
Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet, NOTICE of Removal from State Court, case number (2019 L 005651) filed by Target Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15992897. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Filing)(Letts, Eileen) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Achimas v. Target | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Juliana Achimas | |
Represented By: | Brian J McManus, Jr |
Represented By: | Michael N Folga |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation | |
Represented By: | Eileen Marie Letts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.