Prince v. Michienzi et al
| Shaquille Prince |
| Unknown Sgt. #1, Sgt. Michienzi, Unknown Sgt. #2, Garcia, Unknown Officer, Doris, Karen, Village of Romeoville and Detective Dorris |
| 1:2019cv07265 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED certified copy of Order dated 12/11/19 to Will County Adult Detention Center. (gcy, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued, 2 Original and certified copy of Order dated 12/11/19 as to Defendants Detective Dorris, Sgt. Michienzi to U.S. Marshal for service via email. (gcy, ) |
| MAILED copy of Order dated 12/11/19 w/2 USM-285 forms/Magistrate Judge Consent Form/Instructions to Shaquille Prince. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Shaquille Prince; Jury demand. (No Envelope Postmark date).(gcy, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff'' application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #6 is granted. The trust fund officer at the Will County Adult Detention Center is authorized to deduct $2.74 from Plaintiff's account as the initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making deductions in accordance with this order as set forth below. The Court directs the Clerk to: (1) send a copy of this order, electronically if possible, to the trust fund officer at the Will County Adult Detention Center and to the Court's Fiscal Department; (2) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (3) issue summonses for service of the complaint on Defendants Michienzi and Dorris; (4) dismiss all other Defendants; and (5) send Plaintiff two blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. The Marshal is appointed to effect service and is authorized to send a request for waiver of service in the manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) before attempting personal service. Plaintiff must complete and return a USM-285 form for service on Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is granted. The Court requests that Rachael G. Pontikes of Reed Smith, LLP, 10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606, represent Plaintiff in this case in accordance with counsel'' trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). The recruited attorney falls within the class of users listed in the Electronic Public Access fee schedule adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, therefore, the above-named attorney shall be exempt from the payment of fees for access via PACER to the electronic case files maintained in this court for the above-captioned case only. The recruited attorney is directed to open a separate PACER account to only be used for the above-captioned case, and fees are exempt for the above-captioned case and the previous identified cases filed in this court by this plaintiff only. The assigned attorney shall not be exempt from the payment of fees incurred in connection with other uses of the PACER system in this court. This exemption is valid immediately and for the duration of the attorney's participation in the matter. This exemption may be revoked at the discretion of the Court at any time. The attorney shall contact the PACER Service Center at 1-800-676-6856 or via the link below to create the new PACER account and to make any necessary arrangements for the waiver. A copy of this order shall be sent to the PACER Service Center at http://www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/register.html. A copy of this order shall also be sent to the Systems Department of the Northern District of Illinois, to Plaintiff, and to counsel. Plaintiff's counsel is given leave to file an amended complaint if she chooses. A status hearing is scheduled for February 29, 2020, at 9:10 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 12/11/2019. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shaquille Prince for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit) (Envelope postmarked 12/2/2019) (lma, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) prepay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00; or (2) submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with the instructions in the statement section of this order. Failure to fully comply with this order by December 18, 2019, may result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this case for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. Signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 11/6/2019. Mailed notice (cn).
|
| MAILED copy of order #5 and blank ifp application to Plaintiff (cn). |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shaquille Prince to appoint counsel (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Shaquille Prince for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 9 copies by Shaquille Prince (Attachments: #1 Envelope not postmarked) (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
