Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shaquille Prince v. Michael Michienzi, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MICHIENZI, #357 Romeoville PD, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and TOM DORSEY
Prince v. Garcia et al
as 1:2022cv05703
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Defendant:
Officer Garcia, Officer Jandura, Sgt. Berowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaquille Prince v. Sergeant Michienzi, et al
as 21-1370
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM DORSEY, VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE and SERGEANT MICHIENZI, #357, Romeoville PD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Shaquille Prince v. Officer Unknown #1, et al
as 21-1086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN SERGEANT, #1 of the Westmont Police Department, JUMPOUT DETECTIVE #2, Unknown of the Unknown Police Department, OFFICER UNKNOWN #2, Westmont Police Department and others
Prince v. Arndt et al
as 1:2020cv05847
Defendant:
Chariot Tow Company, Unknown Tow Employee, Robert Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaquille Prince v. Bryan Soderstorm, et al
as 20-2418
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DEKALB, UNKNOWN OFFICER #2, of the Dekalb, Illinois Police Department, BRYAN SODERSTORM, Officer, Dekalb, Illinois Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PRINCE
Prince v. Soderstrom et al
as 1:2019cv07270
Defendant:
Officer Unknown #3, Ackland, The City Of Dekalb and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Michienzi et al
as 1:2019cv07265
Defendant:
Unknown Sgt. #1, Sgt. Michienzi, Unknown Sgt. #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Officer Unknown #1 et al
as 1:2019cv07269
Defendant:
Unknown Tow Company, The City of "Unknown", Officer Unknown #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
