Sopron v. Cassidy et al
| Matthew Sopron |
| Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, Thomas Ptak, K. Maicke, Norfie DiCiolla, Scott Cassidy, Laura Suffield, George Holmes, William Marley, Neil Linehan, L. McDonald, A. Graffeo, Colleen Hyland, County of Cook, City of Chicago, Leonard Bajenski, Thomas Argenbright, The City of Chicago and The County of Cook |
| 1:2019cv08254 |
| December 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The County of Cook by David Alan Adelman (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Adelman, David)
|
|
Filing 33
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. L. McDonald waiver sent on 1/2/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 32
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. William Marley waiver sent on 1/2/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 31
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. K. Maicke waiver sent on 2/5/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) (sxb, ).
|
|
Filing 30
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. Norfie DiCiolla waiver sent on 1/2/2020, answer due 3/2/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 29
(UNOPPOSED) NOTICE of Motion by Vincent Michael Rizzo for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, #28 before Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 2/18/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Rizzo, Vincent)
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION by Defendants Leonard Bajenski, Scott Cassidy, Norfie DiCiolla, Colleen Hyland, Neil Linehan, K. Maicke, William Marley, L. McDonald, Thomas Ptak, Laura Suffield, The County of Cook for extension of time to file answer (UNOPPOSED) (Rizzo, Vincent)
|
|
Filing 27
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scott Cassidy by Vincent Michael Rizzo (Rizzo, Vincent)
|
|
Filing 26
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scott Cassidy by Robert Thomas Shannon (Shannon, Robert)
|
|
Filing 25
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scott Cassidy by Virginia Brette Bensinger (Bensinger, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 24
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scott Cassidy by James Matthias Lydon (Lydon, James)
|
|
Filing 23
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Scott Cassidy by Gretchen Harris Sperry (Sperry, Gretchen)
|
|
Filing 22
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. Laura Suffield waiver sent on 12/30/2019, answer due 2/28/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell) Modified on 2/12/2020 (smm, ).
|
|
Filing 21
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. Scott Cassidy waiver sent on 12/30/2019, answer due 2/28/2020. . (Ainsworth, Russell) Modified on 2/12/2020 (smm, ).
|
|
Filing 20
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Matthew Sopron. Colleen Hyland waiver sent on 2/4/2020, answer due 4/6/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Defendants' Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer and continue initial status hearing #17 is granted. Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead by 2/25/2020. The motion presentment date of 1/28/2020 is stricken; parties need not appear. Initial status hearing set for 2/19/2020 is stricken and reset for 3/11/2020 at 9:00 AM. At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 18
Unopposed NOTICE of Motion by James Peter Fieweger for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #17 before Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 1/28/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Fieweger, James)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION by Defendant The City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer [Joint Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and Continuance of Initial Status Hearing] (Fieweger, James)
|
|
Filing 16
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Alexius Cruz O'Malley (O'Malley, Alexius)
|
|
Filing 15
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by Carolyn E Isaac (Isaac, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 14
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The City of Chicago by James Peter Fieweger (Fieweger, James)
|
|
Filing 13
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Thomas Argenbright, A. Graffeo, George Holmes by Heather Kathreen Afra (Afra, Heather)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Thomas Argenbright, A. Graffeo, George Holmes by Anthony James Masciopinto (Masciopinto, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Sopron as to The County of Cook on 12/30/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Sopron as to The City of Chicago on 1/7/2020, answer due 1/28/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Sopron as to A. Graffeo on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Sopron as to Thomas Argenbright on 1/8/2020, answer due 1/29/2020. (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Initial status hearing set for 2/19/2020 at 9:00 AM. The parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). At least seven days before the initial status hearing, the parties shall file a joint written status report, not to exceed five pages in length. The initial status report shall provide the information described on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under District Judges, Judge Andrea R. Wood, Initial Status Conference. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Thomas Argenbright, Leonard Bajenski, Scott Cassidy, Norfie DiCiolla, A. Graffeo, George Holmes, Colleen Hyland, Neil Linehan, K. Maicke, William Marley, L. McDonald, Thomas Ptak, Laura Suffield, The City of Chicago, The County of Cook. (ec, )
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Sopron by Julie Marie Goodwin (Goodwin, Julie)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Sopron by Jonathan I. Loevy (Loevy, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Sopron by Megan Colleen Pierce (Pierce, Megan)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Matthew Sopron by Russell R Ainsworth (Ainsworth, Russell)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Sopron; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16543070. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ainsworth, Russell)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
