Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Holmes v. Stone, III et al
as 9:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
Isaac M. Stone, III, Samantha Molina and Jared Shedd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Kershaw Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv05747
Plaintiff:
Derrick George Holmes and Derrick George Daise
Defendant:
Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Hewitt et al
as 9:2023cv04238
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
John M. Hewitt, Jeffrey Stephens, Courtney Ann Gibbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Hewitt et al
as 9:2023cv04065
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Defendant:
Jonathan M. Hewitt, Jeffery Stephens, Judge Carmen Tevis Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antusas v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Wayne Antusas
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Neil Linehan, Colleen Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morfin v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2021cv05525
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Morfin
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Neil Linehan, Colleen Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sopron v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2019cv08254
Defendant:
Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, Thomas Ptak, K. Maicke and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sopron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Law Offices of David W. Showalter LLP et al
as 4:2018cv04251
Defendant:
Law Offices of David W. Showalter LLP, David W. Showalter and David W. Showalter, P.C.
Plaintiff:
George Holmes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
