Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services, Inc. et al
| Federal Trade Commission and Dave Yost |
| Wissam Abedel Jilal, Mohammad Souheil, Mohammed Souheil, Educare Centre Services, Inc., Prolink Vision, S.R.L., Sam Jilal, Charles Kharouf, Sam Madi, 9896988 Canada Inc., Mike Souheil and Tripletel, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01305 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles R Norgle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS CASE by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint for Permanent Injuction and Other Equitable Relief, #2 Exhibit Ex Parte TRO with Asset Freeze, Appointment of A Temporary Receiver, #3 Exhibit Prliminary Injuction Order as to Defendants Educare Centre Services, Inc. Tripletel, Inc., and Wissam Abedel Jilal, #4 Exhibit First Amended Complaint for Permanent Injuction and Other Equitable Relief, #5 Exhibit Ex Parte TRO with Asset Freeze, Appointment of Temporary Receiver, #6 Exhibit Preliminary Injuction Order as to Def. Prolink Vision, S.R.L., 9896988 Canada, Inc, Sam Madi, Mohammad Souheil, and Charles Kharouf, #7 Exhibit Preliminary Injuction Order as to Defendants Globex Telecom, Inc., and 9506276 Canada, Inc.)(rc, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
