Hewlett v. Dart et al
Brian Hewlett |
SZC Zerba, Baker, C.C. DOC, Malone, Rafferty, Sanders, Cermak Health Services, Johnson, Div. 10 Electrician, Thomas J. Dart, Ms. Counselor Pondexter, Burrell, Yorslian, Div. 10 Medical Staff, Houston, Falls, Division 10 Engineer, Surane, Szczerba and Pondexter |
1:2020cv06089 |
October 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 . Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $400.00. He may pay by check or money order payable to Clerk, United States District Court. Failure to remit the fee by December 15, 2020, will result in summary dismissal of this case. The Court defers initial review of Plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A until after he has paid the filing fee. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/10/2020. Mailed notice(gcy, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Brian Hewlett for attorney representation (jn, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Brian Hewlett for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits). (jn, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (jn, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Brian Hewlett. (Exhibits). (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Envelope not postmarked). (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.