Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09731
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Houston v. Hallcon Corporation
as 1:2026cv13683
Defendant:
Hallcon Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raymond Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Echenique v. Trump
as 26-3179
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, Pensacola, FL and Panama City, FL, HOUSTON COUNTY PROBATE COURT, WADC APPEAL COURT and others
Plaintiff:
IVETTE T. ECHENIQUE
Breaktime Houston, LLC v Breaktime Corner Market, LLC, et al
as 4:2026cv09701
Defendant:
JOHN DOES #1 - #10, Vape Time Stores, LLC and Breaktime Corner Market, LLC
Plaintiff:
Breaktime Houston LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Lawrence v. Felps
as 26-30659
Defendant:
N. Dartez, East Baton Rouge Sherif's Office, James Cooper, East Baton Rouge Sherif's Office, Tanner Jenkins, East Baton Rouge Sherif's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Mealey and Houston Lawrence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20631
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
