Cases 1 - 10 of 2,274
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dowell v. Kobayashi
as 24-20201
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Dowell
Defendant:
Warden H. Kobayashi, FDC Warden, Lieutenant Standley, Special Housing Unit Lieutenant, Lieutenant Brown, Lieutenant at FDC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reller v. Winch et al
as 5:2024cv05029
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reller
Defendant:
Donell Winch, Robert Yantis, Wade Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Mr. Houston, Ms. Serina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
