Kesek v. Lightfoot et al
| John Kesek |
| Lori Lightfoot, Tom Dart and Cermak Health Services Cook County |
| 1:2022cv01358 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by John Kesek of Change of Address (Envelope postmark 4/18/2022) (cxr, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER : Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $6.02 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order (electronically if possible) to the trust fund supervisor at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration and the Court's Fiscal Department. Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must submit an amended complaint that states a federal claim. Failure to submit an amended complaint by May 13, 2022, will result in dismissal of this lawsuit for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff also is advised that he must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if his address changes. If Plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of his address, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to comply with a Court order and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff an amended complaint form and instructions along with a copy of this order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 4/11/2022.Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 4/11/22 with Amended Complaint Form and Instructions to John Kesek. (gcy, ) |
| MAILED certified copy of Order dated 4/11/22 to Supv. Inmate Trust Fund Accounts Cook County Jail. (gcy, ) |
| MAILED Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to John Kesek (daj, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (daj, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr and Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff John Kesek for attorney representation (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff John Kesek for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibit) (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by John Kesek. (Envelope not postmarked) (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
