Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stovall v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Dakotah Earley
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot, David O. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leo McGuinn v. Lori Lightfoot, et al
as 23-1223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEO B. MCGUINN
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI LIGHTFOOT, JUDITH BURKE, DEANA JOHNSON and others
St. Adalbert's Rosary Group v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv06573
Plaintiff:
St. Adalbert's Rosary Group
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGuinn v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv04111
Plaintiff:
Leo Braden McGuinn
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, Judith Burke, Deana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcguinn v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv03920
Plaintiff:
Leo Braden Mcguinn
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, Judith Burke, Deana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kesek v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
John Kesek
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, Tom Dart and Cermak Health Services Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felipe Gomez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE N. GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, LORI LIGHTFOOT, as Mayor, and personally, STATE OF TEXAS, Interpleader defendant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
