Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.
| Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen |
| Wisconsin Central Ltd. |
| 1:2022cv02435 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 Railway Labor Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
PETITIONER'S ANSWER to counterclaim by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen(Ingles, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 13, the Court sets a schedule on cross-motions for summary judgment as follows: Wisconsin Central (as the challenger of the award) shall file its opening brief and summary judgment motion on 09/16/2022. The Union's response and cross-motion (combined in a single filing) is due by 10/14/2022. Wisconsin Central's reply on its motion and response to the Union's motion (combined in a single filing) is due on 11/04/2022. The parties shall comply with Local Rule 56.1 unless the parties agree to a set of stipulated facts and file the stipulation with the opening brief. The tracking status hearing of 07/01/2022 is reset to 11/18/2022 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (lma, )
|
|
Filing 13
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (McInerney, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen by Sarah Elizabeth Ingles (Ingles, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Robert S. Hawkins' and Joseph P. Sirbak's motions to appear pro hac vice for Defendant Wisconsin Central, Ltd. #6 , #7 are granted. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing 10
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Wisconsin Central Ltd. (Green, Brittany)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to Complaint (WISCONSIN CENTRAL, LTD.'s ANSWER TO PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN AWARD AND ORDER OF A PUBLIC LAW BOARD PURSUANT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT AND PETITION TO VACATE AWARD AND ORDER OF A PUBLIC LAW BOARD), COUNTERCLAIM filed by Wisconsin Central Ltd. against Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen . by Wisconsin Central Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Green, Brittany)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Wisconsin Central Ltd. by Brittany Denise Green (Green, Brittany)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19552043. for Defendant, Wisconsin Central (Sirbak, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-19551996. for Defendant, Wisconsin Central (Hawkins, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen as to Wisconsin Central Ltd. on 5/20/2022, answer due 6/10/2022. (McInerney, Joshua)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Wisconsin Central Ltd. (ak, )
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/01/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 06/22/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If the Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (McInerney, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen by Joshua D. McInerney (McInerney, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19444221. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PLB 7236 AWARD 53, #2 Exhibit B - 2014 BLET CBA)(McInerney, Joshua)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
