Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 145
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff: JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
Carmack v. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen et al
as 1:2024cv10593
Plaintiff: Joseph T Carmack
Defendant: The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
James et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2022cv01519
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and others
Plaintiff: John A. James, Aaron Tiffany and Christopher Kopf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN
as 1:2022cv04139
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS and NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Wisconsin Central Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02435
Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Defendant: Wisconsin Central Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BNSF Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers et al
as 3:2022cv00083
Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Defendant: International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
BNSF Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00052
Counter Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Counter Claimant: International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant / Appellee: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
as 1:2021cv06281
Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?