Sanford v. Truitt et al
| Esmond L. Sanford |
| Lt. Truitt, Wexford Health, IDOC, O. Ayannkoya, Stateville NRC Health Care Unit Staff and John & Jane Does |
| 1:2022cv02748 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MAIL RETURNED, for document #10 sent to Esmond L. Sanford returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received. (ak, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to forward trust fund transactions and accounts to the Court #4 is also denied. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) submit a renewed application that is signed by him, accompanied by a copy of his trust fund statements showing activity in his account or accounts for the entire six-month period immediately preceding his initiation of this action, and certified by an appropriate official; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. The trust fund staff members at Stateville Correctional Center are directed to assist Plaintiff in obtaining a complete trust fund statement and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order by July 29, 2022, will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. The Clerk shall also send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer the Stateville Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 6/27/2022. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| MAILED directed to send a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order to plaintiff, Also mailed a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Stateville Correctional Center. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 11 MAIL RETURNED, for document #9 sent to Esmond L. Sanford returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received; therefore future mailings will not be sent until a new address is provided to the Clerk's Office using a Notification of Change of Address or Pro Se Appearance form. Document will not be mailed out again. (nsf, ) |
| MAILED copy of Order dated 6/8/22, a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis to plaintiff. (nsf, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to forward trust fund transactions and accounts to the Court #4 is also denied. If Plaintiff wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must either (1) submit a renewed application that is signed by him, accompanied by a copy of his trust fund statements showing activity in his account or accounts for the entire six-month period immediately preceding his initiation of this action, and certified by an appropriate official; or (2) pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. The trust fund staff members at Stateville Correctional Center are directed to assist Plaintiff in obtaining a complete trust fund statement and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order by July 6, 2022, will result in summary dismissal of this case. Plaintiff also must promptly submit a change-of-address notification if he is transferred to another facility or released. Failure to keep the Court informed of his address may lead to dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a Court order and for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis and a copy of this order. The Clerk shall also send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer the Stateville Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 6/8/2022. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 6/8/22 to Trust fund Officer at Stateville Correctional Center. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 9 MAILED Prisoner Local Rule 83.15 Letter to all parties of record. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED from Illinois Southern; Case Number 3:22-cv-01038 (gcy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Plaintiff has submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, claiming his constitutional rights were violated at Stateville Correctional Center (Stateville), in Crest Hill, Illinois. Plaintiff is still imprisoned at Stateville. Venue for federal civil rights actions brought under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is governed by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1391(b). According to that statute, such actions may be brought only in (1) the judicial district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside in the same State), (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the courts personal jurisdiction with respect to the action, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. Plaintiff names defendants that work at Stateville. All of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs allegations occurred at Stateville, which is situated in the federal judicial district for the Northern District of Illinois. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 93(a). Plaintiff's claims have no connection to the Southern District. The Court therefore finds that the Northern District is the appropriate forum for the hearing and determination of this civil rights action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1406(a), and on the Court's own motion, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, for a determination as to whether Plaintiff should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915, and such further proceedings as that court may deem appropriate. No summons shall issue in this action unless so directed by the transferee court. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/20/2022. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.]
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 05/17/2022. Consent due by 6/7/2022 (kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.] |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 22-1038-DWD. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/17/2022. (kare)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Forward Trust Fund Transactions and Accounts to the Court by Esmond L. Sanford. (kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Esmond L. Sanford. (kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Esmond L. Sanford. (kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Esmond L. Sanford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(kare) [Transferred from Illinois Southern on 5/24/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
