Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Moore v. Adamski et al
as 3:2026cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
C/O Adamski, John W. Barwick, C/O Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03212
Plaintiff:
Jose L Ortiz
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, Tiona Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. IDOC ASP Employees
as 26-2265
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
IDOC ASP Employees
Duran Johnson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 26-2334
Plaintiff:
DURAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., Health Care IDOC, ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, Menard CC and CONNIE DOLCE, Director of Nurses, Menard CC
Ashe v. IDOC et al
as 3:2026cv00873
Plaintiff:
Tony Ashe
Defendant:
IDOC, Latoya Hughes, Crystel Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Westbrooks et al
as 3:2026cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt Westbrooks, Mr. Parker and IDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2026cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jacob Houston
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Carver et al
as 1:2026cv00364
Petitioner:
Bradley Wheeler
Respondent:
Alicia Carver, Nicodemus, McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckett v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv00826
Plaintiff:
Launden G. Luckett
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Wexford Healthcare Company, Centurion Healthcare Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Andrews et al
as 3:2026cv00814
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
Food Supervisor Andrews, IDOC, John W. Barwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
