Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. v. CryptoFi, Inc. et al
| Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. |
| CryptoFi, Inc., D.M., M.M. and A.D. |
| 1:2022cv03667 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the notice of voluntary dismissal (Dckt. No. #21 ), which is self-effectuating under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (kl, ) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' motion for extension (Dckt. No. #18 ) is hereby granted. The response to the complaint is due by September 13, 2022. The Court reminds counsel that there is no need for a notice of motion during the pandemic, as explained on Judge Seeger's webpage. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Mark Daniel Roth for presentment of extension of time #18 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 8/16/2022 at 09:00 AM. (Roth, Mark) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendants D.M., M.M. for extension of time TO FILE PLEADING RESPONSIVE TO COMPLAINT (Roth, Mark) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company filed suit against CryptoFi, Inc. and three acronyms: D.M., M.M., and A.D. Sometimes a plaintiff does not know the names of the defendants. But that's not the case here. Plaintiff knows the defendants' real names, but Plaintiff elected not to include them in the filing. The complaint unceremoniously included a footnote, adding: "The individual consumer Defendants have been identified by their initials to protect their privacy at the initiation of this litigation." That filing violated the Federal Rules, twice. Rule 10(a) expressly provides that the "title of the complaint must name all the parties." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). And under the Rules, the Court has the power to deviate from that requirement, but the parties do not. By August 22, 2022, any party may file a motion to allow those three defendants to proceed anonymously. That said, the parties should know that, under Seventh Circuit case law, allowing a party to proceed anonymously is reserved for exceptional circumstances. A generic desire for privacy won't cut it. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants D.M., M.M. by James Joseph Eccleston (Eccleston, James) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. regarding Summons and Complaint served on AD on 7/25/22 (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. regarding Summons and Complaint served on MM on 7/27/22 (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. regarding Summons and Complaint served on DM on 7/27/22 (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by M.M., D.M.. M.M. waiver sent on 8/3/2022, answer due 10/3/2022; D.M. waiver sent on 8/3/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Roth, Mark) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants D.M., M.M. by Mark Daniel Roth (Roth, Mark) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CryptoFi, Inc. by Heather Kathreen Afra (Afra, Heather) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CryptoFi, Inc. by Anthony Masciopinto (Masciopinto, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CryptoFi, Inc. by Gerald Haberkorn (Haberkorn, Gerald) |
| Filing 7 DEFENDANT CryptoFi, Inc's corporate disclosure pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and L.R. 3.2 by Defendant CryptoFi, Inc. (Peckham, Thomas) (Docket Text modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 7/27/2022 (jmk, ). |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant CryptoFi, Inc. by Thomas Hill Peckham (Peckham, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 10, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants A.D., D.M., M.M. (jxj, ) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A.. CryptoFi, Inc. waiver sent on 7/15/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Freud, Brandon) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A. (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Freud, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Hinsdale Bank and Trust Company, N.A.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19652996.(Freud, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
