Cases 1 - 10 of 100
West v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv09771
Defendant:
Harris County, Ed Gonzalez, Civil District Clerk, Deputy, of Harris County and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred West, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe - 7 v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2026cv13053
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane D.M. Doe - 7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
D.M. v. Google LLC et al
as 4:2026cv12914
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthew Pagan v. Edward McMahon
as 26-2572
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, OFFICER K.P. PETRONE, in his official and individual capacities, OFFICER T. R. WILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROBERT PAGAN
D.M. v. Labadie et al
as 2:2026cv13931
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
Wendy Labadie and Genesee Intermediate School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.) 2 v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv11674
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.) 2
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA-LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Messina v. D.M. Bowman, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00845
Plaintiff:
Michael Messina
Defendant:
D.M. Bowman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gardner v. Egan et al
as 1:2026cv10625
Plaintiff:
William Gardner
Defendant:
Russell A. Egan, Joseph E. Pizza, M.K. Elliston and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.)1 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09429
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.)1
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
D.M.03 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09188
Plaintiff:
D.M.03
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.