Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Doe D.M. v. Marriott Hotel Services LLC
as 2:2026cv07262
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe D.M.
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
D.M. 774013 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv06063
Plaintiff:
D.M. 774013
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
:Gardner v. Raoul et al
as 1:2026cv06542
Plaintiff:
William-Rashid-Mustapha :Gardner
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Anita Alvarez, Kimberly Foxx and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05063
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (D.M.)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA-LLC and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hight v. Sayre et al
as 2:2026cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hanson Hight
Defendant:
PTLM D.T. Sayre and PTLM D.M. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
D.M. v. G6 Hospitality Property LLC
as 9:2026cv00147
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
G6 Hospitality Property LLC
Pretrial Service:
Erin Lunceford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Hall v. Beasley et al
as 3:2026cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tiara Anche Hall
Defendant:
Officer Zik Beasley, Detective Howard Saunders, Donna Thurston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.M. v. Oakland Unified School District et al
as 3:2026cv01253
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
Oakland Unified School District and Ellen Stufflestreet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
