Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Disabilities Education Act
S.M. et al v. Mcknight et al
as 8:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
S. M., Jennifer Miller, David Miller and others
Defendant:
MONIFA MCKNIGHT and MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
C.M. et al v. Board of Education of Queen Anne's County et al
as 1:2021cv02463
Plaintiff:
C.M., D.M. and K.M.
Defendant:
Board of Education of Queen Anne's County, Matthew Evans, Sean Kenna and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cornish v. City of Baltimore
as 1:2017cv01304
Plaintiff:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLarney et al v. Haines et al
as 1:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
Robert McLarney and Kim McLarney
Defendant:
D.M. Bowman, Inc. and Jason D. Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cornish v. Baltimore City
as 1:2014cv03117
Plaintiff:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant:
Baltimore City, City Council and Mayor and President of the City Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bakkar v. D.M. Bowman Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02401
Plaintiff:
Chambas Bakkar
Defendant:
D.M. Bowman Inc. and Clifton Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
D.M. Bowman, Inc. v. Kish et al
as 1:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
D.M. Bowman, Inc.
Defendant:
Sean P. Kish and Robert T. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
