Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PICOZZI v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv02235
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M.J. PICOZZI
Defendant:
ALLEN SNYDER, KIMBERLY GROEW, STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.M. v. EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2017cv01553
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and E.J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZAIMOV v. WOODS et al
as 2:2016cv04311
Plaintiff:
SEVDALIN S. ZAIMOV
Defendant:
JASON T. WOODS and D.M. BOWMAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R.J. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03285
Plaintiff:
R.J. , DANIELLE BROWN , D.R.M. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv04760
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER VASQUEZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JAMES BARNACLE, VICENT BROADNAX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritchie et al v. Miedema et al
as 1:2013cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jon-Paul Ritchie and Nicole Moran
Defendant:
Thomas J. Miedema and D.M. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Simmons v. Beard et al
as 3:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Blondell Simmons
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley Moore Smeal, D.M. Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.M. et al v. COUNTY OF BERKS et al
as 5:2012cv06762
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERKS , BRANDON CLINTON , TIMOTHY SIMINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHAD GOOD PLUMBING COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHAD GOOD PLUMBING COMPANY and D.M. BRENTZEL BUILDERS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
