Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Walker v. Kenney et al
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronny Deviod Walker, Sr., Ron D.M, D.J. Ron G. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Kenney, Angela Turner Dunham, k.buscaglia@copyright.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Dewey v. Noah Nagy
as 22-1898
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D.M. DEWEY
Respondent / Appellee:
NOAH NAGY, Warden
D.M. v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05338
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Matthew McCurry and Police Officer Joseph Vigiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rouse et al
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Fitzgerald Johnson
Defendant:
Melissa Rouse, D.M. Bogar and J Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leroy L. Brown
Defendant:
D.E. Smith, H.C. Taylor, C.C. Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. J.S.O et al
as 3:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Lee Simms
Defendant:
M.C. Blanton, M.T. Wong, J.S.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. J.S.O. et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Lee Simms
Defendant:
M.C. Blanton, M.T. Wong, J.S.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin #192744 v. Horton et al
as 2:2019cv00122
Defendant:
K. Pelky, Steven Adamson, Jeffrey Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Colvin #192744, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Vanderbeek et al
as 0:2018cv03424
Defendant:
D.M., A.K., Janell Hussain and others
Plaintiff:
Albert White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
