Junious v. W. Baker et al
Angelica Lavern Junious and Angelica Junious |
SGT. W. BAKER #3159, R/O C. CHENGARY #16269, R/LT PURCELL #758, JOHN DOE DEPUTY SHERIFFS, JANE DOE DEPUTY SHERIFFS, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, W. Baker, C. Chengary, Purcell, John Doe, Jane Doe and Tom Dart |
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC |
1:2022cv03681 |
July 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Edmond E Chang |
Charles R Norgle |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by C. Chengary. C. Chengary waiver sent on 8/9/2022, answer due 10/10/2022. (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant C. Chengary by Antonio C. Lee (Lee, Antonio) |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant C. Chengary by Amanda Christine Guertler (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Angelica Junious by Cierra Norris (Norris, Cierra) |
Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 09/30/2022 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 09/23/2022. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
Filing 15 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr no longer assigned to the case pursuant to 40.3(b )(2) This case appears to involve the same parties and subject matter as case number 22 cv 1702 assigned to the calendar of Judge Edmond E. Chang and dismissed prior to the filing of this case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 08/04/2022.(daj, ) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Plaintiffs' motion Pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2) to reassign the instant case to the originally assigned Judge and Magistrate Judge #12 is granted. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE by W. Baker, Cook County, Illinois, Tom Dart, Purcellin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Angelica Junious to reassign case to originally assigned Judge and Magistrate #12 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing Notice of Filing and Certificate of Service)(Lee, Antonio) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Angelica Junious to reassign case to originally assigned Judge and Magistrate (Orozco, Brian) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Cook County, Illinois. Cook County, Illinois waiver sent on 7/18/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County, Illinois by Antonio C. Lee (Lee, Antonio) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Cook County, Illinois by Amanda Christine Guertler (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Tom Dart. Tom Dart waiver sent on 7/18/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Purcell. Purcell waiver sent on 7/18/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by W. Baker. W. Baker waiver sent on 7/18/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants W. Baker, Tom Dart, Purcell by Antonio C. Lee (Lee, Antonio) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants W. Baker, Tom Dart, Purcell by Amanda Christine Guertler (Guertler, Amanda) |
Filing 3 Attorneys' Lien by C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC (Orozco, Brian) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Angelica Lavern Junious by Brian M Orozco (Orozco, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Angelica Lavern Junious; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19654480. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Orozco, Brian) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ey, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.