Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Robbie Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, Superintendent Boutte and Director Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Junious v. W. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
Angelica Lavern Junious and Angelica Junious
Defendant:
SGT. W. BAKER #3159, R/O C. CHENGARY #16269, R/LT PURCELL #758 and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Corey Shaw and Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Peck v. Cook County Sheriff Carney et al
as 1:2019cv04351
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Carney, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart
as 1:2017cv02102
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Stanton
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Hall v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2015cv05202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hall
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, Cook County Correctional Officer Lt. Thompson #242 and Unknown and Unnamed Cook County Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Martinez v. Cook County Sheriff, Tom Dart's Office et al
as 1:2013cv06637
Plaintiff:
Jairo Martinez
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff, Tom Dart's Office and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade et al v. Board of Education of Proviso Township High Schools District 209 et al
as 1:2012cv02276
Plaintiff:
D. W. , Denard Wade and Lajuan Wade
Defendant:
Board of Education of Proviso Township High Schools District 209, Milton Patch, Daniel Johnson and others
Counter_defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
