Whatley v. Williams
Petitioner: Lamar Edward Whatley
Respondent: Warden Williams and Mark Williams
Case Number: 1:2022cv03792
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Matthew F Kennelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTIFICATION to the Court by Lamar Edward Whatley. (Envelope postmark date 9/7/22). (gcy, )
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Petitioner's motion to amend #6 and motion to file and supplement #7 are granted. The deadline for the response to the petition is extended to 10/17/2022. The deadline for petitioner's reply is extended to 11/14/2022. Mailed notice. (mma, )
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION by Petitioner Lamar Edward Whatley to file and supplement (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, )
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION by Petitioner Lamar Edward Whatley to amend and ask the Court for permission to file documents and remaining Exhibits. (Attachments). (Envelope postmark date 8/4/22).(gcy, )
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Respondent is directed to file a response to the habeas corpus petition #1 by October 3,2022. Petitioner's reply is due October 31, 2022. The Clerk is instructed to update the docket to reflect that Respondent is Mark Williams, Warden, Hill Correctional Center. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/8/2022. Mailed notice(gcy, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MAILED Prisoner Local Rule 83.15 Letter to plaintiff. (nsf, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECEIVED from Illinois Central; Case Number 3:22-cv-03105 (nsf,)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to plaintiff. (nsf, )
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (nsf, )
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin S. Bruce on 7/19/2022. The court has reviewed the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody #1 . The challenged conviction originated in Cook County, Illinois, and Petitioner indicates he also has a state postconviction petition currently pending in Cook County. Cook County is located within the Northern District of Illinois. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.(DS) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 7/21/2022.]
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing fee of $ 5.00 received, receipt number 300000058. (MAS) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 7/21/2022.]
June 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Lamar Edward Whatley. (DS) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 7/21/2022.]
June 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Lamar Edward Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(DS) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 7/21/2022.]
June 14, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/14/2022 directing the Petitioner to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days of this Order. If Petitioner is unable to pay the required filing fee, he may file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to pay the required filing fee or file a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis within 30 days, his Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody #1 will be dismissed without prejudice by this court. (DS) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 7/21/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whatley v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lamar Edward Whatley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?