Moloney v. Intuit, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sarah Moloney
Defendant: Intuit, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv06351
Filed: November 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2022 Filing 16 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to #Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates)#, any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this #LINK# will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. (tg, )
December 23, 2022 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorneys Adam Cooke and Allison Holt's Motions for leave to appear pro hac vice #12 and #13 are granted. Mailed notice (lk, )
December 22, 2022 Filing 14 DESIGNATION of Adam Armstrong Cooke as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Intuit, Inc. (Cooke, Adam)
December 21, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20164196. (Holt, Allison)
December 21, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number BILNDC-20164032. (Cooke, Adam)
December 20, 2022 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint #9 is granted. Response shall be due by 1/23/2023. Status hearing set for 2/16/2023 at 9:00 AM stands and will now proceed in Courtroom 2503. All hearings are proceeding in person. Virtual hearings will be held on Fridays at 9:30 AM but must be pre-approved by the Court. If you need to appear virtually, send the attached form to Judge Kendall's courtroom deputy. The courtroom deputy will inform you as to whether your request has been approved. Motion hearing set for 12/22/2022 is stricken. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Virtual Hearing Request Form) (lk, )
December 19, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew P. Shelby for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/22/2022 at 09:00 AM. (Shelby, Andrew)
December 19, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Intuit, Inc. for extension of time to file answer [Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint] (Shelby, Andrew)
December 19, 2022 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Intuit, Inc. (Novack, Stephen)
December 19, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Intuit, Inc. by Andrew P. Shelby (Shelby, Andrew)
December 19, 2022 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Intuit, Inc. by Stephen Novack (Novack, Stephen)
December 8, 2022 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 2/16/2023 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 2/13/2023. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Beginning 12/05/2022, all hearings will be in person. Virtual hearings will be held on Fridays starting 12/9/2022 at 9:30 AM but must be pre-approved by the Court. If you need to appear virtually, send the attached form to Judge Kendall's courtroom deputy. The courtroom deputy will inform you as to whether your request has been approved. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Virtual Hearing Request Form) (lk, )
November 15, 2022 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Intuit, Inc. (emc, )
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sarah Moloney by Mohammed Rathur (Rathur, Mohammed)
November 14, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sarah Moloney by James B. Zouras (Zouras, James)
November 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Stephan, Ryan)
November 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT filed by Sarah Moloney; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20043125.(Stephan, Ryan)
November 14, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jk2, )
November 14, 2022 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jk2, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moloney v. Intuit, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Moloney
Represented By: James B. Zouras
Represented By: Mohammed Rathur
Represented By: Ryan F Stephan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intuit, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew P. Shelby
Represented By: Stephen Novack
Represented By: Adam Armstrong Cooke
Represented By: Allison Marie Holt Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?