Burgess v. Instant Brands, Inc.
| Keyolonda Burgess |
| Instant Brands, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00458 |
| January 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Beth W Jantz |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: In conformity with the foregoing orders, the status set for 6/14/2023 is stricken and reset to 9/14/23 at 1pm. Written discovery requests now to issue by no later than 8/7/23. Fact discovery deadline is stricken for now, and will be reset during the first status hearing. To join the 9/14/2023 status hearing, dial 888-273-3658 and enter access code 2217918. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (exr, ) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Defendant's unopposed extension motion to answer #16 is granted to 04/17/2023. Also, on review of the discovery schedule, the Court sets Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 07/24/2024. The tracking status hearing of 03/24/2023 is reset to 06/09/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Jantz for discovery supervision. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures to issue by 4/28/2023. Written discovery requests to issue by 5/12/23. Fact discovery is set to close 10/27/2023, at which time the Court will set an expert discovery schedule. An initial status is set for 6/14/23 at 10:15 a.m. To join the 6/14/23 status hearing, dial 888-273-3658 and enter access code 2217918. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (as, ) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. for extension of time to file answer (Young, Timothy) |
| Filing 15 STATUS Report Amended Joint Report by Keyolonda Burgess (Kress, Adam) |
| Filing 14 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Beth W. Jantz for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision (including the authority to adjust all deadlines).(mw, ) Emailed notice. |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 9, the parties did not use Judge Chang's required template. It also appears that the answer deadline has come and go, see R. 6. The parties shall file a supplemental status report, by 03/17/2023, addressing the answer deadline, including whether an extension is sought and, if so, whether there is any objection. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures due 04/10/2023. Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or amend pleadings is 07/28/2023. **No summary judgment motion may be filed before the close of fact discovery without prior authorization of the Court.** The rest of discovery supervision is referred to the magistrate judge (including the authority to adjust all deadlines). The tracking status hearing of 03/17/2023 is reset to 03/24/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. by Timothy J. Young (Young, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. by Jordan William Laclair (Laclair, Jordan) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. by Alexandra Maria Charysh (Charysh, Alexandra) |
| Filing 9 STATUS Report (Joint) by Keyolonda Burgess (Kress, Adam) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Adam Kress' motion to appear pro hac vice for the Plaintiff #7 is granted. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20332430. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement)(Kress, Adam) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keyolonda Burgess as to Instant Brands, Inc. on 2/2/2023, answer due 2/23/2023. (Legorreta, Loren) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 03/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 03/09/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keyolonda Burgess by Loren Michael Legorreta (Legorreta, Loren) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Keyolonda Burgess by Timothy S. Tomasik (Tomasik, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Tomasik, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Keyolonda Burgess; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20279642. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Tomasik, Timothy) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Instant Brands, Inc. (emc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
