Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Woodson v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01399
Plaintiff: Anjitina Woodson
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ulloa v. Instant Brands Inc. (TV1)
as 2:2022cv00084
Plaintiff: Otniel Ulloa
Defendant: Instant Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hess v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff: Clint Hess
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allard v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01390
Plaintiff: Carolyn Ruth Allard
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Havens et al v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02909
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc. formerly known as Double Insight, Inc. doing business as Instant Pot Company, Double Insight, Inc. and Instant Brands LLC
Plaintiff: Michelle Havens and Elsie Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Christie Balderas v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00877
Plaintiff: Christie Balderas
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02108
Plaintiff: Brenda Morris
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Riggs v. Instant Brands Inc
as 6:2022cv00428
Plaintiff: Richard Riggs, Jr
Defendant: Instant Brands Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Instant Brands, Inc
as 9:2022cv00047
Plaintiff: April Cox
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruth Scudieri v. Instant Brands, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01732
Plaintiff: Ruth Scudieri
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?