Nelson v. Instant Brands, LLC et al
| David Charles Nelson |
| Instant Brands, LLC, Instant Brands, Inc. and Corelle Brands, LLC |
| 2:2024cv00585 |
| March 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF STAY by David Charles Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Exhibit A (Bankruptcy Court Order))(Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corelle Brands, LLC, Instant Brands, Inc., Instant Brands, LLC (Filing fee $405 receipt number ANVDC-7630593) by David Charles Nelson. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/5/2024. Proof of service due by 6/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Exhibit A (Pressure Cooker User Manual), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - Proposed Summons for Corelle Brands, LLC, #4 Summons - Proposed Summons for Instant Brands, LLC, #5 Summons - Proposed Summons for Instant Brands, Inc.) (Drakulich, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
