Bana et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Sumit Bana and Jyoti Sirohi
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland
Case Number: 1:2023cv01239
Filed: February 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Franklin U Valderrama
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2023 Filing 12 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wray (Treacy, Elizabeth)
March 20, 2023 Filing 11 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wray (Oswald, Craig)
March 14, 2023 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiffs Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi regarding attorney appearance #3 , attorney appearance #4 (Rosen, Adam)
March 14, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi as to Merrick Garland served on 3/9/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Ur Jaddou served on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services served on 3/7/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Christopher Wray served on 3/9/2023, answer due 5/8/2023 (Attachments: #1 Service of Process on US Attorney General, #2 Service of Process on USCIS, #3 Service of Process on DHS, #4 Service of Process on DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, #5 Service of Process on USCIS Director Ur Jaddou, #6 Service of Process on FBI Director Christopher Wray)(Rosen, Adam)
March 14, 2023 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 05/15/2023 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc).
March 14, 2023 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the Plaintiff's "Notice of Docket Error," including that this is not a social security case, docket entry no. 5 is stricken. Emailed notice (axc).
March 13, 2023 Filing 6 Plaintiffs' Notice of Docket Error and Request for Removal of Minute Entry by Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi Re Docket Entry No. 5 (Rosen, Adam)
March 10, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Additionally, on or before the deadline for the filing of the administrative record, the parties shall file a joint status report in which they indicate (i) whether the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (ii) whether they will agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, they shall execute and file with the Court the joint consent form included as part of the Clerk's Notice previously filed in this case. If the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner, they must file an agreed motion for remand. Emailed notice (axc).
March 2, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi by Julia Sverdloff, Ms (Sverdloff, Julia)
March 1, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
March 1, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )
March 1, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (smb, )
February 28, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi by Adam Joseph Rosen (Rosen, Adam)
February 28, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Rosen, Adam)
February 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sumit Bana, Jyoti Sirohi; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20389972. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table with Exhibits A to K)(Rosen, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bana et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sumit Bana
Represented By: Adam Joseph Rosen
Represented By: Julia Sverdloff, Ms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jyoti Sirohi
Represented By: Adam Joseph Rosen
Represented By: Julia Sverdloff, Ms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Jaddou
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Wray
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?