Thompson v. Gertler et al
| Michael Thompson |
| Jeffry Gertler and Richard Gertler |
| 1:2023cv02480 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Contract: Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Uncontested motion to extend date to file responsive pleading #8 is granted. The time for Defendants to answer or otherwise plead is extended to June 30, 2023. The deadline of 6/30/23 for parties to file a joint status report #5 is reset to 7/14/23. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by Plaintiff Michael Thompson for extension of time to file answer (Moynihan, John)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Thompson as to Richard Gertler on 5/25/2023, answer due 6/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Moynihan, John)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Thompson as to Jeffry Gertler on 5/25/2023, answer due 6/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Moynihan, John)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Jeffry Gertler, Richard Gertler (smb, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 6/30/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Thompson by John William Moynihan (Moynihan, John)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Moynihan, John)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: #Local Rule 3.1# requires at the time of filing a case, plaintiff's counsel, or if the case is filed pro se, the plaintiff shall file with the original papers a completed designation sheet (civil cover sheet). No civil cover sheet was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Michael Thompson is directed to file the #Civil Cover Sheet# within 14 days of this notification. Signed by the Executive Committee. (lm, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Michael Thompson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20557926. (Attachments: #1 Appearance)(Cooney, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
