Rampalli v. Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff: Ms. Krystal Rampalli
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 1:2023cv14015
Filed: September 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Manish S Shah
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion to stay #3 is granted, and no appearance is necessary. This case is stayed pending a decision by the JPML. The deadlines for defendant to respond to the complaint and for the parties' joint initial status report are stricken. If the JPML does not transfer the case, the parties must file a joint initial status report within two weeks of the JPML's decision not to transfer. (mss)
November 8, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Motion by Gregory Edward Ostfeld for presentment of motion to stay #3 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 11/13/2023 at 10:00 AM. (Ostfeld, Gregory)
November 8, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION by Defendant Walgreen Co. to stay - Unopposed Motion to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination (Ostfeld, Gregory)
October 23, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Walgreen Co. (khg, )
October 19, 2023 Filing 2 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 11/28/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, )
September 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Krystal Rampalli; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-21130141. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Appearance Form)(Willey, Roy)
September 22, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxm, )
September 22, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rampalli v. Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. Krystal Rampalli
Represented By: Roy T Willey, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?