Santoyo v. North Riverside Police Department et al
Ruben Santoyo |
North Riverside Police Department and STT Security and Investigations |
1:2024cv01505 |
February 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Jorge L Alonso |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Ruben Santoyo to Subpoena CCTV Footage (Attachments) (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/10/2024.) (jg, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed an application #3 to proceed in forma pauperis and for attorney representation, which is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; Plaintiff's application for attorney representation is denied without prejudice. However, for the reasons stated in the "Statement" section below, Plaintiff's allegations are not sufficient to survive this Court's initial screening, and the complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by 5/1/2024. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 4/5/2024. Mailed notice.(jj, ) |
Filing 6 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Ruben Santoyo. (Received at the Intake Counter on 03/13/2024) (daj, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Ruben Santoyo (lm, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Ruben Santoyo for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (lm, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (lm, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ruben Santoyo (lm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (lm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.