Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Santoyo v. North Riverside Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
North Riverside Police Department and STT Security and Investigations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santoyo v. Oak Lawn Police Department
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
Oak Lawn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santoyo v. Cook County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruben Santoyo v. Martha M. Pacold
as 23-3048
Petitioner:
RUBEN SANTOYO
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
Interested Party:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KEVIN SODJA and ISAI JUNES
Ruben Santoyo v. Martha M. Pacold
as 23-2879
Petitioner:
RUBEN SANTOYO
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
Interested Party:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KEVIN SODJA and ISAI JUNES
Santoyo v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03559
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kevin Sodja and Isai Junes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandoval v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poirier v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Wilson et al
as 4:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Regan, Henry David Jackson, Nicholas Hamm and others
Defendant:
B.P. Waller, Eric Wilson and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
