Sanchez Molina et al v. Noem et al
Plaintiff: Edwin Sanchez Molina and Mayra Balderas
Defendant: Kristi Noem and Kevin Riddle
Case Number: 1:2025cv04575
Filed: April 28, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John F Kness
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2025 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal" #8 . Because the Notice was filed before the opposing parties served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the Notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. The hearing set for 7/30/2025 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (exr, )
July 17, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Cobb, Erin)
June 12, 2025 Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 7/30/2025 at 9:30 A.M. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 1-855-244-8681, Access Code: 2315 003 3696. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice. (exr, )
June 5, 2025 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Joshua Samuel Press as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Kristi Noem, Kevin Riddle (Press, Joshua)
May 6, 2025 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Kristi Noem, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued, #3 Summons Issued)(mam, )
April 28, 2025 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Mayra Balderas, Edwin Sanchez Molina by Erin Christine Cobb (Cobb, Erin)
April 28, 2025 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Cobb, Erin)
April 28, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edwin Sanchez Molina, Mayra Balderas; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23403397.(Cobb, Erin)
April 28, 2025 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (qrtr, )
April 28, 2025 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez Molina et al v. Noem et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin Sanchez Molina
Represented By: Erin Christine Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mayra Balderas
Represented By: Erin Christine Cobb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kristi Noem
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Riddle
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Represented By: Joshua Samuel Press
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?