National Institute of Family Life Advocates et al v. Raoul
National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Women's Help Services, Rockford Family Initiative, Relevant Pregnancy Options and Pro-Life Action League |
Attorney General Kwame Raoul |
3:2023cv50279 |
July 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Lisa A Jensen |
Iain D Johnston |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Kwame Raoul(Kinkead, Darren) |
Filing 32 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services by Michael Mchale (Mchale, Michael) |
Filing 31 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: Defendant's motion for an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiffs' complaint #30 is unopposed and granted. Defendant shall answer Plaintiffs' complaint by 9/8/2023. By 10/16/2023, the parties shall jointly file the PDF fillable initial status report form found on Judge Jensen's webpage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Initial Status Conferences and Reports. The parties shall participate in a 26(f) conference and exchange their 26(a)(1) disclosures by 10/20/2023. A telephonic status conference is set for 10/23/2023 at 10:30 AM. Public access is available via the following call-in number: (877) 336-1831 with access code 2813746 #. Counsel for all parties are ordered to appear by using the following link: https://teleconference.uc.att.com/ecm/?bp=4044436397&mac=2813746 or by using the call-in number above. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
Filing 30 MOTION by Defendant Kwame Raoul for extension of time Joint motion to set schedule and adjust existing deadlines Presented before Magistrate Judge (Kinkead, Darren) |
Filing 29 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 8/3/2023 before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Order Number: 46519, 46513, 46501. Court Reporter Contact Information: Heather Perkins-Reiva, heather_perkins-reiva@ilnd.uscourts.gov, (779)772-8309. IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings. Redaction Request due 9/4/2023. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/12/2023. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/10/2023. (Perkins-Reiva, Heather) |
Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen: The parties shall jointly complete the PDF fillable initial status report form found on Judge Jensen's webpage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Initial Status Conferences and Reports and file by 8/17/2023. Mailed notice. (vk) |
Filing 27 RULE 65 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 8/4/2023: (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SB1909) (yxp, ) |
Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Preliminary Injunction hearing held on 8/3/2023. Order to enter. (yxp, ) |
Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages #5 is granted. (yxp, ) |
Filing 24 Western Division ADR Notification (jp, ) |
Filing 23 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kwame Raoul by Marci L. Sahinoglu (Sahinoglu, Marci) |
Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kwame Raoul by Mary Alice Johnston (Johnston, Mary) |
Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Defendant's motion #20 is denied. The motion is meritless on many levels, too many to explain in a minute order. Defendant has been given timely notice of the hearing and was served last week. This lawsuit should not come as a surprise to Defendant. Any standing concerns or any other jurisdictional issues can and will be addressed at the hearing. The preliminary injunction hearing will proceed as scheduled. Be there. (yxp, ) |
Filing 20 MOTION by Defendant Kwame Raoul for extension of time to file response/reply EMERGENCY Presented before District Judge (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Prim v. Raoul)(Kinkead, Darren) |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kwame Raoul by Darren Bernens Kinkead (Kinkead, Darren) |
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: I told you there would be more questions. Here's two easy ones. Are the Centers' counselors compensated by the Center for their services? Do the Centers charge for their services or for baby supplies? (yxp, ) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Consistent with this Court's practice of providing questions in advance of evidentiary or contested hearings when possible, attached is an admittedly incomplete list of questions that the Court will raise at the preliminary injunction hearing. Some questions are factual; some questions are legal; and some are a mix of fact and law. To the extent the questions are factual, the Court would find it very helpful if a witness were available who could answer these questions under oath. Again, this is just a preliminary list. The Court will have more, but the Court thought it would be helpful to provide at least the current list in advance of tomorrow's hearing. (Attachments: #1 List of Questions) (yxp, ) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kwame Raoul by R. Douglas Rees (Rees, R.) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services regarding set/reset hearings, #14 (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: A Preliminary Injunction hearing on the plaintiff's motion #3 is set for 8/3/2023 at 1:30 PM and shall be held in person. Plaintiff shall provide personal service of the notice of the hearing to the Illinois Attorney General's Office as well as by email and a phone call, no later than 4:30 P.M. today. (yxp, ) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Relevant Pregnancy Options, National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services, Pro-Life Action League as to Kwame Raoul on 7/31/2023, answer due 8/21/2023. (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services by Brennan Tyler Brooks (Brooks, Brennan) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services by Thomas L. Brejcha, Jr (Brejcha, Thomas) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Kwame Raoul (smb, ) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services regarding memorandum in support of motion, #4 , attorney appearance #2 , declaration, #7 , MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for leave to file excess pages EMERGENCY MOTION #5 , notification of affiliates pursuant to local rule 3.2 #9 , declaration #6 , MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for preliminary injunction MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for temporary restraining order EMERGENCY MOTION #3 , declaration, #8 (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by All Plaintiffs (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 8 DECLARATION of Peter Breen, Esq. regarding memorandum in support of motion, #4 , motion for preliminary injunction,, motion for temporary restraining order, #3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Breen, Peter) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of John Jansen regarding memorandum in support of motion, #4 , motion for preliminary injunction,, motion for temporary restraining order, #3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Breen, Peter) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Professor Michael New regarding memorandum in support of motion, #4 , motion for preliminary injunction,, motion for temporary restraining order, #3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Breen, Peter) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for leave to file excess pages EMERGENCY MOTION (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services in support of motion for preliminary injunction,, motion for temporary restraining order, #3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Breen, Peter) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for preliminary injunction , MOTION by Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services for temporary restraining order EMERGENCY MOTION (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Pro-Life Action League, Relevant Pregnancy Options, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services by Peter Christopher Breen (Breen, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Relevant Pregnancy Options, National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Rockford Family Initiative, Women's Help Services, Pro-Life Action League; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20871708. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1A, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(Breen, Peter) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa Jensen. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (pg, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.