Cases 1 - 6 of 6
National Institute of Family Life Advocates et al v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv50279
Plaintiff:
National Institute of Family Life Advocates, Women's Help Services, Rockford Family Initiative and others
Defendant:
Attorney General Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Veronica Price, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 17-2196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERONICA PRICE, DAVID BERGQUIST, ANN SCHEIDLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, RAHM EMANUEL, as Mayor of the City of Chicago, REBEKAH SCHEINFELD, Commissioner of Transportation for the City of Chicago and others
Price et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv08268
Plaintiff:
Veronica Price , David Bergquist , Ann Scheidler and others
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Rahm Emmanuel , Rebekah Scheinfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Organization for Wome, et al v. Joseph Scheidler, et al
as 13-2197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUMMIT WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, INCORPORATED, DELAWARE WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, INCORPORATED and NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INCORPORATED, on behalf of itself and its women members and other women who use or may use the services of women's health centers that provide abortions
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. SCHEIDLER, PRO-LIFE ACTION LEAGUE, INCORPORATED, ANDREW D. SCHOLBERG and others
Pro-Life Action League, Inc. v. Village of Bridgeview, Illinois
as 1:2009cv04182
Plaintiff:
Pro-Life Action League, Inc.
Defendant:
Village of Bridgeview, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fox Valley Families Against Planned Parenthood et al v. City of Aurora, Illinois, The
as 1:2007cv04803
Plaintiff:
Fox Valley Families Against Planned Parenthood, Fox Valley Families Against Planned Parenthood, Pro-Life Action League, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Illinois, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
