Brown v. City of Mounds, Illinois et al
| Edward R. Brown |
| The City of Mounds, Illinois, Mounds City, Illinois, Waymon A. Butler, Jr., William J. Wood, Marc Stout, Charles J. Mullins, Donald Jones, Jr. and Robert E. Riddle |
| 3:2008cv00861 |
| December 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Will |
| David R Herndon |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice because case has settled. Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 2/24/10. (anj)
|
|
Filing
60
60 DAY ORDER advising that case has settled. Responses due by 3/30/2010. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/28/10. (skp)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Strike and Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss and Strike. Counts III and VIII are DISMISSED without prejudice and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amend ed complaint, amending Counts III and VIII. Amended Complaint due by 10/13/09. The Court STRIKES Plaintiff's prayer for attorney's fees and prejudgment interest on state law claims, but DENIES the motion to strike prejudgment interest on federal claims. See order for specifics. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/22/09. (anj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
