Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PHILLIPS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00590
Defendant:
SHANE DADY, MR/MS HATTEN, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PHILLIPS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wood v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08308
Plaintiff:
William J Wood
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEALE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BEALE
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, JEFFREY WITHERITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC. , GUFFIE SWINK, IV , WILLIAM J. WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOWNSEND v. WOODS et al
as 2:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
ALVIN TOWNSEND
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. WOODS, STEVE V. MOSER, WAL-MART TRANSPORTATION LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE WOODS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL GILL, RAYMOND SOBINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
DION PATRICK LEE, III
Defendant:
RONALD J. BRYANT, WILLIAM J. WOODS, ROBERT K. SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WOOD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30123
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. WOOD, WILLIAM J. WOOD, A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
WOOD v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. WOOD
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
