Martin v. Hudson et al
| Derrick Martin |
| Lori Oakley, Angela Grott, Mr. Hass, Mr. Hudson, Richard Harrington and Lori Brenner |
| 3:2013cv00416 |
| April 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (NJR/bkl) Plaintiff's claim (Count 3) is dismissed with prejudice against Oakley, Brenner and Harrington; Counts 1 and 2 are dismissed without prejudice against defendants Hass, Hudson and Grott. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/8/13. (bkl)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier, COUNT 2 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a constitutional claim upon which relief may be granted. COUNT 3 is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upo n which relief may be granted. Defendants OAKLEY and BRENNER are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants HUDSON, HASS, GROTT, and HARRINGTON: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/30/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
