Cases 1 - 10 of 47
MARTIN v. MITCHELL
as 3:2025cv00269
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTIN
Respondent:
DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNT v. GABBY et al
as 5:2025cv00218
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTIN HUNT
Respondent:
GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Derrick King v. The Soundcoat Co Inc, et al
as 25-1951
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MARTIN KING
Defendant:
THE SOUNDCOAT CO INC, PARAMOUNT DIE CORP, POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES INC and others
Hunt v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv01460
Petitioner:
Derrick Hunt and Derrick Martin Hunt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In re: Derrick Martin King
as 25-1216
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK MARTIN KING
Respondent:
PLAINTIFFS' CO LEAD COUNSEL, PLAINTIFFS' NEGOTIATING COUNSEL, CORNERSTONE MEDICAL SERVICES MIDWEST LLC and others
King v. Cornerstone Medical Services, et al
as 2:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin King
Defendant:
PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA HOLDING CORPORATION and Cornerstone Medical Services - Midwest LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
King v. Cornerstone Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv01344
Defendant:
Cornerstone Medical Services - Midwest LLC, Philips RS North America Holding Corporation and Philips RS North America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNT v. CASTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Petitioner:
DERRICK MARTIN HUNT
Respondent:
M CASTRO, PATRICK LABAT, FANI WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
