Adediji v. Ryker et al
| Abayomi Adediji |
| Dr Litherland, Martin, S A Godinez, Lee Ryker and Unknown Party |
| 3:2013cv00932 |
| September 10, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Brown |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams, IT IS ORDERED that within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall either pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or move for leave to proceed as a pauper under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff the appropriate forms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that COUNT 3 against DR. MEYER fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and is thus DISMISSED with prejudice; DR. ME YER is DISMISSED from this action, as there are no other claims against him. Counts 1 and 2 against Defendants LEE RYKER, S.A. GODINEZ, MARTIN, DR. LITHERLAND and the UNKNOWN PARTY shall proceed. The Clerk of Court shall prepare for Defendants L EE RYKER, S.A. GODINEZ, MARTIN and DR. LITHERLAND: (1) Form 5 (Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons), and (2) Form 6 (Waiver of Service of Summons). (Action due by 11/4/2013). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 10/3/2013. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.