Clark v. Lind et al
| Ramon Clark |
| Bart Lind, Furlow, J. Lashbrooke and John/Jane Doe |
| 3:2015cv00963 |
| August 28, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Pope |
| Staci M. Yandle |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing suit, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. 12) is DENIED.Plaintiff is ADVISED that this dismissal shall not count as one of his allotted strikes under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 1/4/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
7
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 1) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if he desires to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file a complaint withi n 35 days of the entry of this order (on or before November 6, 2015), thereby properly initiating an action. Failure to file a proper complaint by the prescribed deadline will result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and Plaintiff will remain obligated to pay the filing fee. (Amended Pleadings due by 11/6/2015). Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 10/2/2015. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
