Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Furlow
as 3:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Margaret Furlow
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BECKLEY v. FURLOW et al
as 1:2026cv01255
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TIMOTHY FURLOW
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID BECKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Furlow v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv01685
Plaintiff:
Lemeshay Furlow
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arredondo v. Holguin et al
as 5:2025cv00222
Plaintiff:
April Lanore Arredondo
Defendant:
Judge FNU Holguin, Judge Reed Filley, Phillip Mack Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salazar (PS) v. Adam County Det. Facil et al
as 1:2025cv03001
Plaintiff:
Paul Salazar
Defendant:
Adam County Det. Facil, April Mayfield, Thomas Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Furlow v. Dudek
as 4:2025cv00542
Plaintiff:
Pearlie Furlow
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
