Hyde v. Lashbrook et al
| Ronald W Hyde |
| Lashbrook, Edwards, Spiller and Christine Brown |
| 3:2015cv01139 |
| October 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Perry |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE as a sanction for Plaintiff's failure to disclose his litigation activity, and fraudulently obtaining approval to proceed IFP herein. Plaintiff's motion seeking injunctive relief (Doc. 7) is DENIED AS MOOT. This dismissal shall not count as another strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's pauper/IFP status is REVOKED. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/13/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
10
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a written statement to the Court to: (1) explain why he failed to list his full litigation history in his complaint; (2) to show cause why this Court should not dismiss this case as a sanction for his fa ilure to provide full and accurate information on his previous cases and strikes. Plaintiff SHALL SUBMIT his response within 21 days of the date of this order (on or before November 27, 2015). Failure to file a response shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. An unsatisfactory response shall also result in the dismissal of this case. (Action due by 11/27/2015). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/5/2015. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
